1. The Extensible Hypertext Markup Language. 2. It includes all HTML, combined with XML. 3. It is compatible with all browsers and has XML, so it is a combination of HTML and XML. It also has coding to get past "bad" HTML. 4. It has another language in it, but it is not a very big change.
1. Extensible Hypertext Markup Language 2. W3Schools says it's more "strict" and it's "cleaner". Its HTML PLUS XML 3. Supported by all browsers 4. Not too big of a change.
#1: Extensible Hypertext Markup Language #2: It forces you to use correct formatting in all the tags you use so you have to code correctly #3: All web browsers support the use of XHTML #4: Not Really
1. EXtensible HyperText Markup Language 2. It's different from HTML because it has XML 3. Because all web browsers support XHTML 4. Its not a big change
1. The Extensible Hypertext Markup Language.
ReplyDelete2. It includes all HTML, combined with XML.
3. It is compatible with all browsers and has XML, so it is a combination of HTML and XML.
It also has coding to get past "bad" HTML.
4. It has another language in it, but it is not a very big change.
1. Extensible Hypertext Markup Language
ReplyDelete2. W3Schools says it's more "strict" and it's "cleaner". Its HTML PLUS XML
3. Supported by all browsers
4. Not too big of a change.
#1: Extensible Hypertext Markup Language
ReplyDelete#2: It forces you to use correct formatting in all the tags you use so you have to code correctly
#3: All web browsers support the use of XHTML
#4: Not Really
1) Extensible Hypertext Markup Language.
ReplyDelete2) It is more formal, no mistakes.
3) All browsers support it.
4) Not so much.
1) it is basically the same thing but more advanced.
ReplyDelete2) you have to use it right or it will screw up the whole thing.
3)All web browsers.
4)not really
1. EXtensible HyperText Markup Language
ReplyDelete2. It's different from HTML because it has XML
3. Because all web browsers support XHTML
4. Its not a big change